The Fragmented Self: Obscuring Cosmic Consciousness

The Transparent Evils of Globalism

AI Art by Mark Eden

In this post, we aim to explore the intricate relationship between the self, tradition, and the concept of cosmic consciousness, ultimately revealing how the deconstruction of traditional values and institutions can lead to a fragmented, egocentric "I" and an atrophied sense of interconnectedness within greater reality.

This exploration will not only delve into the psychological and spiritual consequences of this fragmentation but also expose how these forces are leveraged by proponents of a homogenizing globalism that seeks to undermine cultural diversity and concentrate power in the hands of an elite few.

By examining the potential pitfalls of postmodernism's deconstruction of tradition and drawing upon the arguments of Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin, a prominent advocate for traditionalism, we will illuminate the importance of reclaiming our sense of self and reconnecting with the deeper currents of cosmic consciousness in order to resist the homogenizing forces of globalism and evolve a more balanced and multipolar world.

The Rise of the Isolated "I"

The postmodern era has witnessed a profound shift in our understanding of the self. Traditional narratives and institutions that once provided a sense of stability and coherence have been subjected to relentless deconstruction. While this critical analysis has exposed power imbalances and challenged oppressive systems, it has also arguably contributed to a growing sense of fragmentation and disorientation in Western societies.

The erosion of grand narratives, coupled with the rise of individualism and consumerism, has given rise to the isolated "I," an egoic-self defined primarily by personal experiences, desires, and material possessions. This "I" is often detached from any sense of collective identity or shared purpose, adrift in a sea of relativism and subjective truths.

While this emphasis on individual autonomy can be somewhat liberating, it can also lead to a sense of isolation and alienation. Without a grounding in tradition, community, or a broader sense of meaning, the isolated egoic "I" can become lost in a fragmented world, struggling to find a sense of belonging or purpose.

What Is A Monad? Leibniz’s Monadology (see footnotes)

The Non-Monadic Clustered Self

Before delving into the consequences of soul fragmentation, it's crucial to establish a clear understanding of the self as conceived within the framework of the Non-monadic Cluster Theory. This theory challenges the traditional notion of a singular, unified "I" at the core of our being, proposing instead a dynamic and interconnected cluster of various elements that contribute to our sense of self.

The ‘non-monadic cluster nature of self’ primarily refutes the ego theory of self, which posits a single, unified, and continuous self. This traditional view, often associated with philosophers like René Descartes ("I think, therefore I am"), suggests that there's a core essence of self that remains constant throughout life, despite changes in experiences, beliefs, or circumstances.

Conversely, the non-monadic cluster view emphasizes:

• Experiences — Memories, emotions, sensations, thoughts, and perceptions all contribute to the mosaic of our individual narratives.

• Beliefs — Values, attitudes, opinions, and worldviews shape how we interpret and interact with the world.  

• Roles — Social identities, familial roles, and occupational positions influence our behavior and sense of self in different contexts.  

• Relationships — Connections and interactions with others shape our sense of belonging and contribute to our understanding of who we are.  

• Physical body — Our bodily sensations, physical characteristics, and embodied experiences ground our sense of self in the material world.

These elements are not static but rather dynamic and interconnected, constantly influencing and shaping one another. The self, then, is not a fixed entity but an ever-evolving process, a vibrant mosaic of consciousness crystallizing through the dynamic fusion of these diverse elements.

This view challenges the traditional notion of a core, unchanging "I" that persists throughout life. Instead, the non-monadic cluster theory suggests that our sense of self is fluid, context-dependent, and multifaceted. It acknowledges the potential for contradictions and inconsistencies within our identity, embracing the complexity and dynamism of human experience.

Integrated Information Theory and Nature of Consciousness

Integrated Information Theory (IIT) was developed by neuroscientist Giulio Tononi and his collaborators at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Tononi initially proposed IIT in 2004. The theory has since gone through several iterations, with the latest version being IIT 3.0.

Christof Koch, another prominent neuroscientist, has helped develop these later versions of the theory that include theoretical advancements and a more computationally intensive variant of the integrated information measure.¹

The concept of the non-monadic clustered self aligns with a number of theories in neuroscience and consciousness studies, particularly IIT, which proposes that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of reality, arising from the integrated information within a system. The more interconnected and integrated the information, the higher the level of consciousness.  

IIT suggests that consciousness is not limited to the brain but could potentially exist in any system with sufficient integrated information. This opens up the possibility of consciousness existing beyond the physical realm, perhaps as a different dimension of reality. Or as panpsychism — everything possesses some degree of consciousness. Leibniz's theory of monads is particularly important in panpsychist thought.²  

Within this framework, the self can be understood as a highly integrated information structure, a complex network of interconnected experiences, beliefs, and relationships. The richness and depth of our consciousness unfold through the complex synthesis of these elements.

By applying the principles of Integrated Information Theory to our understanding of the self, we can appreciate its dynamic and interconnected nature. However, it also exposes the potential for fragmentation when these connections are disrupted or weakened, resulting in an attenuated self-awareness and a disconnection from the fundamental source of consciousness.

Soul Fragmentation and the Loss of Self

The concept of ‘soul retrieval’ in shamanic traditions offers a useful metaphor for understanding the potential consequences of this fragmentation. In these traditions, trauma, grief, or significant life challenges can cause soul loss, where segments of the individual's essence become separated from core self. This fragmentation leads to a loss of vitality, a sense of disconnection, and a diminished sense of wholeness.

We contend that our current societal malaise is a type of collective soul loss. The deconstruction of traditional values and institutions can be seen as contributing factors. When the shared narratives, rituals, and social structures that once provided a sense of cohesion and meaning are dismantled, the ‘soul of society’ becomes fragmented, leading to social unrest, polarization, and a decline in collective well-being. Moreover, it’s by design. More on that shortly.

This fragmentation can also manifest at the individual level. Without the grounding provided by tradition and community, the isolated "I" can become susceptible to a range of psychological and spiritual challenges. The loss of a sense of belonging, purpose, and connection to something larger than oneself contributes to anxiety, depression, and a sense of existential angst.  

The "I" and Cosmic Consciousness

The idea of cosmic consciousness, found in various spiritual and philosophical traditions, suggests that there is a fundamental interconnectedness between all beings and a greater reality. This interconnectedness transcends the boundaries of the individual ego and offers a sense of unity with the cosmos.

The ego with its emphasis on individual autonomy and separation, can be seen as antithetical to this concept of cosmic consciousness. By focusing solely on the individual ego and neglecting the broader context of our existence, we become disconnected from this deeper sense of belonging and purpose.

This disconnection can manifest in various ways, from a lack of empathy and compassion for others to a sense of alienation from the natural world. It can also lead to a diminished sense of spiritual meaning and purpose, as the individual struggles to find their place within the larger cosmic order.

Alexander Dugin

Alexander Dugin and the Defense of Tradition

Alexander Dugin, a Russian philosopher and political theorist, has emerged as a prominent advocate for traditional values and institutions. He argues that tradition provides a vital foundation for social cohesion, cultural identity, and spiritual grounding.  

Dugin criticizes the postmodern emphasis on individualism and relativism, arguing that it leads to a fragmented and nihilistic worldview. He contends that traditional structures, such as religion, family, and community, offer a sense of stability, meaning, and belonging that is essential for human flourishing.

Dugin's defense of tradition is not simply a nostalgic yearning for the past. He recognizes the need for adaptation and evolution within traditional frameworks. However, he emphasizes the importance of preserving the core values and principles that have sustained societies for centuries and are now threatened.

He argues that tradition provides a vital link to our ancestors and cultural heritage, offering a sense of continuity and identity in a rapidly changing world. It also provides a framework for moral and ethical guidance, helping individuals navigate the complexities of life and make wise choices.

Furthermore, Dugin contends that tradition can foster a sense of connection to the sacred and the transcendent. By participating in rituals, ceremonies, and shared practices, individuals tap into a deeper dimension of reality and experience a sense of unity with something larger than themselves.  

Reintegrating the Fragmented Self

While the deconstruction of tradition has undoubtedly brought about important social and cultural changes, it has also created new challenges for individuals and society as a whole. The rise of the isolated "I" and the fragmentation of the ‘soul of society’ have contributed to a sense of disconnection and alienation.

To address these challenges, we need to find ways to reintegrate the fragmented self and reclaim a sense of interconnectedness with a larger reality. This involves recognizing the limitations of the ego and embracing the potential benefits of tradition, community, and spiritual practice.

As previously mentioned, shamanic soul retrieval³ can be helpful, as are other modalities such as mandala meditation⁴ exercises, as encouraged by C.G. Jung.

By integrating the valuable aspects of tradition with the critical insights of postmodernism, we can create a more balanced and holistic approach to self-understanding and social organization. This involves:

• Cultivating self-awareness — Engaging in introspection and reflection to understand our own biases, motivations, and values. An acute lack of self-awareness remains a significant issue in the political arena.  

• Building community — Seeking out meaningful connections with others and participating in shared practices that foster a sense of belonging and common purpose.

• Connecting with the sacred — Exploring spiritual practices and traditions that offer a sense of connection to something larger than ourselves.  

• Embracing tradition critically — Recognizing the value of tradition while remaining open to adaptation and evolution.

By embracing these principles, we will begin to heal the fragmentation of the self and reclaim a sense of wholeness, meaning, and interconnectedness with the cosmos.

The Transparent Evils of Globalism

The implications of this exploration extend far beyond the realm of individual psychology. In a world experiencing the transition from a unipolar power structure dominated by "The West," also known as the Hegemon, to a multipolar world envisioned by thinkers like Alexander Dugin and the BRICS nations, the concept of the fragmented self takes on huge geopolitical significance.

I assert that humanity is undergoing a tumultuous transition to multipolarity. This transition, however, is facing vigorous opposition. The Hegemon, over a period dating back to President Kennedy’s assassination in 1963, and with the collapse of the Soviet Union having dotted the i’s in 1991, has transformed from a seemingly benevolent Pax Americana to what many now describe as a de facto evil warmongering empire.

This empire, historically inclined toward funding endless wars, is referred to by some commentators on Substack, including myself, as the Anglo-Zionist Empire. Former President Eisenhower warned us of encroaching influence from the “Military Industrial Complex.”

The "Military Industrial Complex," as Eisenhower foresaw, has now metastasized into a global hegemonic hammer that prioritizes profit and control over peace and human well-being.

The inherent evil is transparent, evident in the endless wars, the engineered economic crises, the suppression of dissent, and the manipulation of information.

Economic Concerns

• Job losses in developed countries due to outsourcing

• Increased income inequality within nations

• Exploitation of workers in developing countries

Cultural Impacts

• Erosion of local cultures and traditions

• Homogenization of global culture

• Loss of national identity

Political Issues

• Weakening of national sovereignty

• Increased power of multinational corporations and NGOs

• Challenges to democratic processes

These political, cultural, and economic issues, often associated with the erosion of national borders and the rise of global governance structures, contribute to the broader trend of soul loss and fragmentation.

The evil forces that contribute to soul loss and fragmentation on a personal level – the erosion of tradition, the ascendance of the cloistered "I," and the disconnection from cosmic consciousness – are mirrored in the strategies employed by the proponents of a world-dominating form of globalism.

Organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO), often criticized for their top-down approach to governance, can be seen as promoting a homogenized, one-size-fits-all vision of the future that disregards the cherished cultural and spiritual values of diverse societies.

This pursuit of global conformity, we argue, relies on the creation of a fragmented and compliant populace. By undermining traditional institutions and eroding collective identities, these globalist forces seek to create a world of atomized individuals, easily swayed by mass media narratives and susceptible to centralized control. As the WEF’s Yuval Harari proclaimed, “Free will is over.”⁵

The loss of a sense of belonging, purpose, and connection to something larger than oneself renders individuals more vulnerable to manipulation and less likely to resist a globalist agenda that seeks to homogenize cultures and concentrate power in the hands of an elite few.

In contrast, a multipolar world, as envisioned by Dugin and others, recognizes the importance of cultural diversity and the inherent value of distinct traditions. It acknowledges that true strength lies not in conformity but in the harmonious coexistence of diverse perspectives and ways of life.

By fostering a sense of rootedness in tradition and encouraging individuals to connect with their unique cultural heritage, a multipolar world can counter the soul-fragmenting forces of globalism and promote a more balanced future.

Ultimately, the struggle between unipolarity and multipolarity is not merely a political or economic contest; it is a battle for the soul of humanity. By reclaiming our sense of self, reintegrating our fragmented psyches, and reconnecting with the deeper currents of cosmic consciousness, we can resist the homogenizing forces of globalism and contribute to the emergence of a world that honors the diversity, dignity, and divine potential of all beings.

Therefore this is a call to reclaim not only our individual souls but also the soul of society, paving the way for a future where interconnectedness, not isolation, guides our path.

Mandala Meditation

---

From the comments section with hat tip to

Dr. Nicholas Corrin

:

A timely post on the precariousness of the human soul. Thank you! And thanks too for mentioning Dugin whose thoughtful traditionalism offers counter balance to the metastasis of pseudo-freedom ushered through postmodernism. The latter coincides with rot of actual freedom (predicated on shared meaning, values and history). This efflorescence, as you say, produces narcissistic fragmentation of the self. It gives rise to solipsism and irrationalism infused with pseudo-heroism. A shallow questioning of authority is everywhere in evidence and is easily manipulated by psyops: viz flat earth theory, or the non-existence of viruses. These are the sour fruits of postmodernism decried by Dugin. Human debilitation and spiritual capitulation are covertly managed by archontic actors working through NGOs, unelected thinktanks, elitist hideaways, and vampiric shadow beings such as Peter Thiel, Musk and Harari. Your principles for reintegration of the self are healthy. I would also point out the discoveries left us by Robert Monroe in his documented out of body experiences. In his last book, The Ultimate Journey, Monroe discovered the plurality of the core self in etheric outer space. To him, it is a cluster. The group is primordially bonded and travels interdimensionally in pursuit of the Great Unknown. It is composed not of separate monads but of a shared resonance.

1.

2. What Is A Monad? Leibniz’s Monadology (article)

3. Shamanic Soul Retrieval (article)

4. Mandala Meditation (article)

5. ^^^ (video just over 1-minute)