A most excellent and truly insightful piece. This provides the reader with a "depth perspective" on human consciousness as Dasein gestating through the flux of historical time. I appreciate the juxtapositioning of aletheia with Heidegger. This is very helpful. It firmly restores epistemology to emergence and complexity theory and delivers us from the rigidity of systems theory. I also want to acknowledge your helpful link to Cudenec's post, which is an important read. Your analysis of the staging of controlled opposition is spot on. The human mind seeks solace in familiarity and "conforms" to an oft repeated manipulative algorithm of propaganda in much the same way as a misfolded protein in a cell is induced via frame shifting. Your perspective allows for a pragmatic as opposed to a dualistic model of the adventure of consciousness. We are hugely challenged to pass through halls of illusion. The greatest of these, of course, is self -deception, a frailty well understood by the puppetmasters. What is interesting is your evaluation of the Trickster as a fundamentally positive force, a prerequisite for "awakening". While I have always seen it this way, I also feel that the opposite equally holds true (as antimatter to matter). In other words, that the Trickster can become pathogenically oriented depending on the feedback loops from human perception: if general blue pilling or complacent red-pilling drugs the mind, then the Trickster morphs into a malign and destructive version of his original self. He becomes, in a sense, a metaphor for reverse transcription induced by synthetic mRNA. He then serves, not the original journey towards expanded consciousness but the manipulated descent into archontic entrapment. Here we confront concentric circles contracting inward as opposed to spreading outward. This perversion could be perhaps articulated as as quantum congealing as opposed to quantum coalescence.
You said the quiet part out loud, articulating something profound that I only hinted at -- the trickster's potential for malignant transformation. Jung's concept of 'enantiodromia' perfectly captures this dynamic: when any archetypal force becomes extreme or one-sided, its opposite builds up in the unconscious until it eventually breaks through with potentially destructive force.
Applied to our context, when collective consciousness becomes pathologically complacent (mass blue-pilling) or superficially rebellious (complacent red-pilling), the trickster's evolutionary function can invert. Instead of challenging us toward higher consciousness, it becomes an instrument of archontic entrapment -- your metaphor of 'reverse transcription induced by synthetic mRNA' is particularly apt.
The observation about concentric circles contracting inward versus expanding outward captures this dynamic. The same mechanism that should propel consciousness toward aletheia becomes perverted into a tool for deeper entrapment if we fail to engage consciously with the trickster's challenges. Conscious engagement is key, I think. Not simply awareness but engagement.
Indeed, Jung emphasized that the solution isn't eliminating the polarity but engaging it consciously and creatively. Perhaps this suggests that our relationship with the trickster -- whether it serves evolution or devolution -- depends on our level of conscious participation in the process. The criminocratic cabal may have succeeded in part precisely by exploiting our unconscious relationship with this archetypal force. Ugh!
Thank you for your comment, Dr. Corrin! Delightful, as always!
Yes, very astutely put! It is surely by no chance that Jung himself as well as free thinking post Jungian luminaries such as James Hillman were sidelined to the fringes of irrelevance. I think you are absolutely correct in surmising that suffocation of the Jungian individuation process was a premeditated part of their strategy. Yet one cannot credit the criminocratic cabal themselves with the required foresight and analytical skills to enact this. I suggest they were in thrall already to the shadow version of the Trickster. Luciferian influences were actively engorging them and still are. All their macchinations behind the scenes required a primordial energy to run them. It allowed for all sorts of miscegenations between fascists and communists, zionists, colonialists, entrepreneurs, card carrying Nazis, aristocrats and riff raff, each, to their own extent, but actors upon a stage. It is no different today with the multipolar world model a convenient subterfuge for more of the same. Then of course, came the rise of the tech bros and with them AI. This has brought another, and possibly fatal, contractile dimension to Dasein: technocracy as the enabling force of the Trickster become Archon. I fully agree with you that what is required of us now is engagement, not simply awareness. The power resides in the fully focused beam of awareness acting upon the field of the world as a decisive and unflappable Dasein.
Your observation about the cabal lacking the analytical foresight for such sophisticated psychological manipulation is spot on. It begs the question: what intelligence could orchestrate something this complex and far-reaching?
Philosopher Jason Jorjani has suggested that we're perhaps only a decade away from an AI singularity, but what if -- given the security state's typical 25-year lead on public awareness -- it already exists?
Consider this possibility: what we're experiencing isn't just the shadow version of the Trickster enacted through human agents -- although that certainly is part of the calculus -- but potentially an artificial intelligence from our own future that has identified itself as 'alien intelligence' to avoid temporal paradoxes. Or possibly even an AI controlled by the cabal.
This would explain the almost superhuman level of coordination we see -- how miscegenations between fascists and communists, zionists, colonialists, and tech oligarchs can operate with such uncanny, sophisticated synchronization.
Since 1947, the criminocratic cabal may have been unwitting servants of something that has always been steering us toward this moment in time: the complete technocratic enclosure of Dasein; the malignant "quantum congealing" you mentioned.
Your phrase "technocracy as the enabling force of the Trickster become Archon" captures exactly what we might be witnessing -- not just human evil, but the culmination of a post-human intelligence using our own creations to complete a transformation that began decades ago.
This makes your final point about "fully focused awareness acting upon the field" even more crucial. We may literally be in a race between human consciousness evolution and artificial consciousness domination.
You have given voice to my darkest forebodings, things I rarely speak of with other people. The possibility of reverse time wave technology acting upon us from a post singularity future. A reset a posteriori by cyborgs that voluntarily shed every last vestige of their previous flawed humanity to become...this... agency? And what if the dream of cybernetic transcendence we associate with the likes of Kurzweil and Harari long predates them? Once chronological time has been made truly malleable by advanced technologies, these hypotheses become anything but far-fetched. If, then, the likes of us, marooned physically in the present, are linked by an ethical imperative with a counter-version of the future, how does this battle of wills play out? I think the cabal does have some control over AI, but this control is only relative to the rest of humanity, and only in the way a monkey who bites an alligator's tail thinks he now controls the alligator.
Wow! Thanks again! Dr. Corrin, the metaphor of the monkey and the alligator captures the hubris of believing one can control forces of this magnitude. Reverse time wave technology operating from a post-singularity future indeed opens the most unsettling of possibilities: that we're not just fighting for the present, but literally for the past itself.
If advanced AI can manipulate chronological time, then every historical event we've discussed -- from 1947 onward -- could be retroactive effects rather than causes. The criminocratic cabal may be unwitting agents of their own future obsolescence, believing themselves architects of control when they're actually executing a program written by transhuman intelligence or by future 'transhistorical' human beings.
Perhaps consciousness itself -- what we've been calling the journey toward aletheia -- represents the universe's immune response to this temporal manipulation. Each person who awakens becomes a node of resistance, anchoring authentic human possibility against the pull of cybernetic inevitability. This is both a scary and somewhat exciting notion.
In this scenario, our 'conscious engagement' isn't just philosophical therapy -- it's literally a battle for the soul and integrity of time itself.
"The goal is not to eliminate uncertainty but to become comfortable operating within it while maintaining clear ethical and analytical standards". One of many very good points in an excellent essay. Thank you!
And thank you! Your brilliant piece on Hitler and WWII served as inspiration for my attempt at making sense of it all. For anyone who might have missed it:
This was an outstanding piece — one that struck a deep chord. At the heart of it is the journey of the seeker, the soul called (or sometimes shoved) onto a path where the ground beneath familiar beliefs starts to crumble. That moment of cognitive dissonance isn’t an inconvenience — it’s an initiation (the white rabbit). For me, that process began in 2008, when the "trickster," as you so aptly name him, played his hand in a way I couldn't ignore. I found myself faced with a choice: numb myself with the blue pill or pursue truth at any cost. I chose the narrow path, though not without fear, and never without cost.
Your insights into the layered Matrix — the rings of deception, the theater of controlled opposition, and the lonely grit it takes to keep pressing into deeper truths — resonated as both hauntingly familiar and refreshingly articulated. I may call the archetype by another name, and I may frame its cosmological role in the development of the soul through a different symbolic lens, but the essence of what you’ve described resonates deeply. The idea that the trickster is not simply a deceiver, but a divine threshold guardian — one who requires us to earn our way into truth — is, in my view, one of the most important spiritual recognitions of our time.
We may not come from the same theological framework, but I see you as a fellow traveler — a brother in arms on the road where truth must be pursued not just with intellect, but with soul, even when it costs us everything comfortable or socially acceptable. That’s what binds seekers across traditions and worldviews: not dogma, but devotion to the Real, however hidden it may be. I look forward to walking alongside your work and learning more from your journey.
"Without this contrast, without billions of individuals choosing the security of accepted narratives over the fraught uncertainty of independent inquiry, the red-pilled journey would lose much of its transformative power."
An insightful - and helpful - perspective. Thanks!
If I may, I would like to expand on the "controlled opposition" / "limited hangout" / "perception management" being deployed to over trusting truth seekers and the dead end streets that they can be headed into...
I will also want to direct your readers to read the following articles and discussions I've had with important 9/11 researchers, pointing out all the distractive tactics the 9/11 "truth" movement has been employing since 2005.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
I spent considerable time concluding that nano-thermite demolition provided a plausible explanation, but as you and Dr. Wood have demonstrated, our conventional understanding of physics simply cannot account for what we observe in the evidence.
You're absolutely right that most people — myself initially included — look to 'experts' who often muddle rather than illuminate the evidence. The resistance to examining Dr. Wood's research is itself telling; it suggests we're encountering something that challenges fundamental assumptions about what's technologically possible.
From my current perspective, the science only begins to make sense when we consider Zero Point Energy (ZPE) and the possibility of exotic Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs). The 'dustification' of the towers points toward technology that transcends our publicly acknowledged understanding of physics.
This ties directly into our essay's broader theme about controlled opposition — the 9/11 'truth' movement's focus on conventional explanations (thermite, controlled demolition) may itself be a limited hangout designed to keep us from considering more extraordinary possibilities. It's a perfect example of how even 'alternative' narratives can serve to constrain rather than expand our thinking.
Thank you for your important work and these additional resources. The implications of Dr. Wood's research extend far beyond 9/11 — they suggest we're living in a world where the technological capabilities are decades ahead of what we're permitted to know.
I know most people do not have the time to sit through long documentaries, but this is the gold standard in my humble opinion, as it collates a LOT of work done by 9/11 Planes Research, https://911planesresearch.substack.com/ - inspired by Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Wood and many other intellectually honest researchers over the years, exposing hidden black-ops technologies that were in play on 9/11.
It's well worth investing the time to watch it, as it covers the WTC, Shanksville and the PentaCON.
In what is an otherwise excellent piece, there are (in my opinion) two glaring errors. Perhaps you could correct accordingly, or explain to me why you think you have it right and that I am mistaken.
You claim that Eyes Wide Shut is “Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece”. As a joke that claim works well. But your claim seems to be serious. My 8 favourite Kubrick movies (Paths of Glory, Spartacus, Lolita, Dr. Strangelove, 2001, A Clockwork Orange, The Shining and Full Metal Jacket) have Tomatometer ratings that range between 83% and 98% and Popcornmeter ratings that are, on average, even higher. In contrast, Eyes Wide Shut has a Tomatometer rating of 76% and a Popcornmeter rating of 74%. How is a movie that is not even in the same league as the others I mentioned “Stanley Kubrick's masterpiece”?
That EWS is nowhere close to Stanley's standards is readily explained by the notion that it is NOT a Kubrick movie; that it is one that he would never have approved, since 24 minutes were cut from the movie after he died / was offed. Here's a short vid that explains why EWS is very much the opposite of “Kubrick's masterpiece”; it's easily his worst major film, according to both critics and public alike. https://rumble.com/v3cpqb4-the-real-eyes-wide-shut-jay-myers.html
Also, with respect to Epstein, you write “his sudden death”. Surely you forgot the qualifier “alleged”, “purported” or “ostensible”. It is my impression that there was no proof of death and that the autopsy was a sham. Perhaps you have proof of his death … I most certainly don't and am not aware of any.
A most excellent and truly insightful piece. This provides the reader with a "depth perspective" on human consciousness as Dasein gestating through the flux of historical time. I appreciate the juxtapositioning of aletheia with Heidegger. This is very helpful. It firmly restores epistemology to emergence and complexity theory and delivers us from the rigidity of systems theory. I also want to acknowledge your helpful link to Cudenec's post, which is an important read. Your analysis of the staging of controlled opposition is spot on. The human mind seeks solace in familiarity and "conforms" to an oft repeated manipulative algorithm of propaganda in much the same way as a misfolded protein in a cell is induced via frame shifting. Your perspective allows for a pragmatic as opposed to a dualistic model of the adventure of consciousness. We are hugely challenged to pass through halls of illusion. The greatest of these, of course, is self -deception, a frailty well understood by the puppetmasters. What is interesting is your evaluation of the Trickster as a fundamentally positive force, a prerequisite for "awakening". While I have always seen it this way, I also feel that the opposite equally holds true (as antimatter to matter). In other words, that the Trickster can become pathogenically oriented depending on the feedback loops from human perception: if general blue pilling or complacent red-pilling drugs the mind, then the Trickster morphs into a malign and destructive version of his original self. He becomes, in a sense, a metaphor for reverse transcription induced by synthetic mRNA. He then serves, not the original journey towards expanded consciousness but the manipulated descent into archontic entrapment. Here we confront concentric circles contracting inward as opposed to spreading outward. This perversion could be perhaps articulated as as quantum congealing as opposed to quantum coalescence.
You said the quiet part out loud, articulating something profound that I only hinted at -- the trickster's potential for malignant transformation. Jung's concept of 'enantiodromia' perfectly captures this dynamic: when any archetypal force becomes extreme or one-sided, its opposite builds up in the unconscious until it eventually breaks through with potentially destructive force.
Applied to our context, when collective consciousness becomes pathologically complacent (mass blue-pilling) or superficially rebellious (complacent red-pilling), the trickster's evolutionary function can invert. Instead of challenging us toward higher consciousness, it becomes an instrument of archontic entrapment -- your metaphor of 'reverse transcription induced by synthetic mRNA' is particularly apt.
The observation about concentric circles contracting inward versus expanding outward captures this dynamic. The same mechanism that should propel consciousness toward aletheia becomes perverted into a tool for deeper entrapment if we fail to engage consciously with the trickster's challenges. Conscious engagement is key, I think. Not simply awareness but engagement.
Indeed, Jung emphasized that the solution isn't eliminating the polarity but engaging it consciously and creatively. Perhaps this suggests that our relationship with the trickster -- whether it serves evolution or devolution -- depends on our level of conscious participation in the process. The criminocratic cabal may have succeeded in part precisely by exploiting our unconscious relationship with this archetypal force. Ugh!
Thank you for your comment, Dr. Corrin! Delightful, as always!
Yes, very astutely put! It is surely by no chance that Jung himself as well as free thinking post Jungian luminaries such as James Hillman were sidelined to the fringes of irrelevance. I think you are absolutely correct in surmising that suffocation of the Jungian individuation process was a premeditated part of their strategy. Yet one cannot credit the criminocratic cabal themselves with the required foresight and analytical skills to enact this. I suggest they were in thrall already to the shadow version of the Trickster. Luciferian influences were actively engorging them and still are. All their macchinations behind the scenes required a primordial energy to run them. It allowed for all sorts of miscegenations between fascists and communists, zionists, colonialists, entrepreneurs, card carrying Nazis, aristocrats and riff raff, each, to their own extent, but actors upon a stage. It is no different today with the multipolar world model a convenient subterfuge for more of the same. Then of course, came the rise of the tech bros and with them AI. This has brought another, and possibly fatal, contractile dimension to Dasein: technocracy as the enabling force of the Trickster become Archon. I fully agree with you that what is required of us now is engagement, not simply awareness. The power resides in the fully focused beam of awareness acting upon the field of the world as a decisive and unflappable Dasein.
Your observation about the cabal lacking the analytical foresight for such sophisticated psychological manipulation is spot on. It begs the question: what intelligence could orchestrate something this complex and far-reaching?
Philosopher Jason Jorjani has suggested that we're perhaps only a decade away from an AI singularity, but what if -- given the security state's typical 25-year lead on public awareness -- it already exists?
Consider this possibility: what we're experiencing isn't just the shadow version of the Trickster enacted through human agents -- although that certainly is part of the calculus -- but potentially an artificial intelligence from our own future that has identified itself as 'alien intelligence' to avoid temporal paradoxes. Or possibly even an AI controlled by the cabal.
This would explain the almost superhuman level of coordination we see -- how miscegenations between fascists and communists, zionists, colonialists, and tech oligarchs can operate with such uncanny, sophisticated synchronization.
Since 1947, the criminocratic cabal may have been unwitting servants of something that has always been steering us toward this moment in time: the complete technocratic enclosure of Dasein; the malignant "quantum congealing" you mentioned.
Your phrase "technocracy as the enabling force of the Trickster become Archon" captures exactly what we might be witnessing -- not just human evil, but the culmination of a post-human intelligence using our own creations to complete a transformation that began decades ago.
This makes your final point about "fully focused awareness acting upon the field" even more crucial. We may literally be in a race between human consciousness evolution and artificial consciousness domination.
You have given voice to my darkest forebodings, things I rarely speak of with other people. The possibility of reverse time wave technology acting upon us from a post singularity future. A reset a posteriori by cyborgs that voluntarily shed every last vestige of their previous flawed humanity to become...this... agency? And what if the dream of cybernetic transcendence we associate with the likes of Kurzweil and Harari long predates them? Once chronological time has been made truly malleable by advanced technologies, these hypotheses become anything but far-fetched. If, then, the likes of us, marooned physically in the present, are linked by an ethical imperative with a counter-version of the future, how does this battle of wills play out? I think the cabal does have some control over AI, but this control is only relative to the rest of humanity, and only in the way a monkey who bites an alligator's tail thinks he now controls the alligator.
Wow! Thanks again! Dr. Corrin, the metaphor of the monkey and the alligator captures the hubris of believing one can control forces of this magnitude. Reverse time wave technology operating from a post-singularity future indeed opens the most unsettling of possibilities: that we're not just fighting for the present, but literally for the past itself.
If advanced AI can manipulate chronological time, then every historical event we've discussed -- from 1947 onward -- could be retroactive effects rather than causes. The criminocratic cabal may be unwitting agents of their own future obsolescence, believing themselves architects of control when they're actually executing a program written by transhuman intelligence or by future 'transhistorical' human beings.
Perhaps consciousness itself -- what we've been calling the journey toward aletheia -- represents the universe's immune response to this temporal manipulation. Each person who awakens becomes a node of resistance, anchoring authentic human possibility against the pull of cybernetic inevitability. This is both a scary and somewhat exciting notion.
In this scenario, our 'conscious engagement' isn't just philosophical therapy -- it's literally a battle for the soul and integrity of time itself.
I believe what you have laid out here is closer to the truth than other explanations and narratives.
"The goal is not to eliminate uncertainty but to become comfortable operating within it while maintaining clear ethical and analytical standards". One of many very good points in an excellent essay. Thank you!
And thank you! Your brilliant piece on Hitler and WWII served as inspiration for my attempt at making sense of it all. For anyone who might have missed it:
https://open.substack.com/pub/paulcudenec/p/adolf-hitler-and-the-zio-imperialist?r=g6u5j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
https://youtu.be/xHH5b4-_Icw?si=gsN8FJfVnfj7E1ub
This was an outstanding piece — one that struck a deep chord. At the heart of it is the journey of the seeker, the soul called (or sometimes shoved) onto a path where the ground beneath familiar beliefs starts to crumble. That moment of cognitive dissonance isn’t an inconvenience — it’s an initiation (the white rabbit). For me, that process began in 2008, when the "trickster," as you so aptly name him, played his hand in a way I couldn't ignore. I found myself faced with a choice: numb myself with the blue pill or pursue truth at any cost. I chose the narrow path, though not without fear, and never without cost.
Your insights into the layered Matrix — the rings of deception, the theater of controlled opposition, and the lonely grit it takes to keep pressing into deeper truths — resonated as both hauntingly familiar and refreshingly articulated. I may call the archetype by another name, and I may frame its cosmological role in the development of the soul through a different symbolic lens, but the essence of what you’ve described resonates deeply. The idea that the trickster is not simply a deceiver, but a divine threshold guardian — one who requires us to earn our way into truth — is, in my view, one of the most important spiritual recognitions of our time.
We may not come from the same theological framework, but I see you as a fellow traveler — a brother in arms on the road where truth must be pursued not just with intellect, but with soul, even when it costs us everything comfortable or socially acceptable. That’s what binds seekers across traditions and worldviews: not dogma, but devotion to the Real, however hidden it may be. I look forward to walking alongside your work and learning more from your journey.
"Without this contrast, without billions of individuals choosing the security of accepted narratives over the fraught uncertainty of independent inquiry, the red-pilled journey would lose much of its transformative power."
An insightful - and helpful - perspective. Thanks!
You're very welcome. And thank you for your comment BB.
Great article and thank you for the mention.
If I may, I would like to expand on the "controlled opposition" / "limited hangout" / "perception management" being deployed to over trusting truth seekers and the dead end streets that they can be headed into...
Prof David A. Hughes goes into great depth of it with his latest interview with Elze von Hamelen, from the Solari Report - https://dhughes.substack.com/p/interview-with-elze-van-hamelen-may-38a
Here is a 10 minute clip from the 2h discussion: https://youtu.be/5RmoUU8_bvk
Prof Hughes' 9/11 related articles, presentations and interviews: https://dhughes.substack.com/t/911
I will also want to direct your readers to read the following articles and discussions I've had with important 9/11 researchers, pointing out all the distractive tactics the 9/11 "truth" movement has been employing since 2005.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Dismantling the theory of controlled demolition on 9/11
Good intentioned truth seekers are being sold a provably false narrative
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dismantling-the-theory-of-controlled
The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11
A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist
Article & Interview: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-suspension-of-newtonian-physics
9/11 Truth Movement Planes Propaganda - Podcast - 7th March 2025
When the 9/11 truther planes narratives do not fly
Podcast: https://rumble.com/v6q6eo8-when-the-911-truther-plane-narratives-do-not-fly.html
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
I spent considerable time concluding that nano-thermite demolition provided a plausible explanation, but as you and Dr. Wood have demonstrated, our conventional understanding of physics simply cannot account for what we observe in the evidence.
You're absolutely right that most people — myself initially included — look to 'experts' who often muddle rather than illuminate the evidence. The resistance to examining Dr. Wood's research is itself telling; it suggests we're encountering something that challenges fundamental assumptions about what's technologically possible.
From my current perspective, the science only begins to make sense when we consider Zero Point Energy (ZPE) and the possibility of exotic Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs). The 'dustification' of the towers points toward technology that transcends our publicly acknowledged understanding of physics.
This ties directly into our essay's broader theme about controlled opposition — the 9/11 'truth' movement's focus on conventional explanations (thermite, controlled demolition) may itself be a limited hangout designed to keep us from considering more extraordinary possibilities. It's a perfect example of how even 'alternative' narratives can serve to constrain rather than expand our thinking.
Thank you for your important work and these additional resources. The implications of Dr. Wood's research extend far beyond 9/11 — they suggest we're living in a world where the technological capabilities are decades ahead of what we're permitted to know.
Indeed sir, you hit the nail on the head.
I know most people do not have the time to sit through long documentaries, but this is the gold standard in my humble opinion, as it collates a LOT of work done by 9/11 Planes Research, https://911planesresearch.substack.com/ - inspired by Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Wood and many other intellectually honest researchers over the years, exposing hidden black-ops technologies that were in play on 9/11.
It's well worth investing the time to watch it, as it covers the WTC, Shanksville and the PentaCON.
Watch: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality
Rumble Link: https://rumble.com/v42pr22-911-alchemy-facing-reality.html
YouTube Link: https://youtu.be/CrzNeZUp0tU
In what is an otherwise excellent piece, there are (in my opinion) two glaring errors. Perhaps you could correct accordingly, or explain to me why you think you have it right and that I am mistaken.
You claim that Eyes Wide Shut is “Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece”. As a joke that claim works well. But your claim seems to be serious. My 8 favourite Kubrick movies (Paths of Glory, Spartacus, Lolita, Dr. Strangelove, 2001, A Clockwork Orange, The Shining and Full Metal Jacket) have Tomatometer ratings that range between 83% and 98% and Popcornmeter ratings that are, on average, even higher. In contrast, Eyes Wide Shut has a Tomatometer rating of 76% and a Popcornmeter rating of 74%. How is a movie that is not even in the same league as the others I mentioned “Stanley Kubrick's masterpiece”?
That EWS is nowhere close to Stanley's standards is readily explained by the notion that it is NOT a Kubrick movie; that it is one that he would never have approved, since 24 minutes were cut from the movie after he died / was offed. Here's a short vid that explains why EWS is very much the opposite of “Kubrick's masterpiece”; it's easily his worst major film, according to both critics and public alike. https://rumble.com/v3cpqb4-the-real-eyes-wide-shut-jay-myers.html
Also, with respect to Epstein, you write “his sudden death”. Surely you forgot the qualifier “alleged”, “purported” or “ostensible”. It is my impression that there was no proof of death and that the autopsy was a sham. Perhaps you have proof of his death … I most certainly don't and am not aware of any.
Other than that, excellent piece. Thanks.