12 Comments
Oct 28Liked by R. Toney Brooks, PhD

I like this theory

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, Larry. I'm also rather fond of it. 😊

Expand full comment

If I am not mistaken, it was Roger Penrose who first hypothesized distinct quanta of consciousness moving through microtubules which, at the physical level, burgeon off axons; after physical death, these quanta are released into the Greater Field where they coalesce into undying remnants of what we would call "the self". Such a view would substantiate the investigations of Raymond Moody and the University of Heaven. In Robert Monroe's last book, "Ultimate Journey", he described the non-monadic cluster nature of the core self that pertains beyond physical existence, which is a remarkable epiphany. It seems as though the psychion and psychon concepts are really variations on the original notion of the classical photon and Popp's biophoton. The more pressing question right now however, in the context of the WEF, Agenda 2030, and the transhumanism takeover, relates to invasive technologies which generate "false memories", boasted about at Davos 2024. If this is now a given, and if memory in a physical human is predicated upon information passing within microtubules, then what kind of invasive technology would succeed in hacking this? Another important question relates to the linguistic objectification of feeling states as "qualia" distinct from "quanta". This has always been a stumbling block in quantum theory(ies) since the emotional realm is not reducible to quantifiable information and physicists in particular are hardly renowned for their emotional health and emotional self-awareness. The idea of a qualitative fundamental reality as opposed to a quantitative one has been theorized by Ibrahim Karim, founder of Biogeometry, whose spiritual and intellectual roots lie equally in ancient Egypt and esoteric Islam.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 28·edited Oct 28Author

No doubt Dr. Paul Mocombe's Consciousness Field Theory builds upon Sir Roger Penrose's Orch OR theory of consciousness. Both are foundational to the Theory of Heaven as a quantum field as is Giulio Tononi's Integrated Information Theory. All these theories benefited from contributions and refinements by multiple researchers over time.

The WEF Agenda is a worry. Harari's video about hacking consciousness was terrifying. I've posted it a couple of times and will do so again here. I'm unfamiliar with Karim and Biogeometry. Thank you for mentioning this.

https://youtu.be/3vrkTl9Sv6Y?si=ljA33w1c2TnZrysa

Expand full comment

Thanks for that additional information about Tononi and Mocombe which I did not know of. Your post is quite comprehensive. Karim's work may well interest to you since it draws from Egyptian theories of resonance. The latter align with Vedic stratification of consciousness (ubiquitous Atman) which supports the later phenomenal discoveries of Sir JC Bose. Thus, for example, "qualia" becomes intrinsic to all existent phenomena, from minuscule bits of dust or even quarks through metals and plants to vast galaxies (conjoining Planck's length to macro). Same with vitality and cognition and even soul striving (the mental and causal bodies). These variegated strata of consciousness enwrap within outer electromagnetic forces, and evolution correlates with an infinite structure of octaves. In term's of Harari's nonstop menacing output (Harari seems to me to be a synthetic egregore made to order by the transhumanists), the applications of resonant form have the potential to act as antidotes. Karim was able to do this very successfully with whole towns in Switzerland ravaged by dirty electricity and toxic emfs, but the applications or resonance can also be extended to counter some of the astral/archontic frequencies which run AI. This is self evident for example in Arlesheim and Dornach, which are close by me.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 29·edited Oct 29Author

Fascinating! Thank you for your comment and informative additions to the discourse. Egyptian cosmology, as you know, held that the universe is governed by Maat (order, balance, harmony), with each element of life and the cosmos interconnected in a delicate balance. This ethos aligns intriguingly with what you've highlighted about the Vedic stratification of consciousness and the idea of resonance as a counteractive force against disruptive frequencies — whether environmental, digital, or even astral.

I appreciate the connection you’ve drawn to Ibrahim Karim’s work in Switzerland, particularly regarding his use of BioGeometry to mitigate the effects of toxic EMFs and ‘dirty electricity.’ Your perspective offers much to consider in how resonant forms might harmonize with, or even shield against, the influences of emergent technologies, AI, or perhaps ‘synthetic’ frequencies, not to mention Globalist Evildoers. I look forward to delving into Karim’s work, especially in light of these broader implications. And you're spot on regarding Harari!

Expand full comment

It is interesting to observe that transliteration of Maat is so close phonetically to Mahat from Samkhya, both evoking wisdom as primordial stratum of the created universe. Mahat is also found in Islam. Mahat and Maat as primordial ground of consciousness precede psychons whilst also representing their ultimate fulfillment. This correlates with what you call Heaven to be radically distinguished from lower cap hell, that place of outer darkness, lostness and forgetting. I find it interesting in the light of Anglo-American influence on the transhumanist movement that our Latin derived words conscience and consciousness were split apart in the English language some centuries ago whilst this never occurred in the romance languages French, Italian and Spanish. This linguistic Anglo-American mutation seems a prequel to the full-fledged, dis-empathetic AI driven computer language espoused by Tim Cook at Apple, which is a synthetic transmogrification of authentic qualia. We find here one root of Silicon Valley's swallowing of the world and regurgitating it as the Internet of People, the golden egg of plenty Harari and the stakeholders seek.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 30·edited Oct 30Author

Thank you for such a thoughtful comment, Dr. Corrin! Your point that Maat and Mahat both “precede psychons” resonates with both our Theory of Heaven and Theory of Archetypes, where psychons not only embody individual essence but are fundamentally shaped by archetypal patterns, such as Maat and Mahat.

These archetypes, akin to Jungian forms, represent not just an organizing blueprint but the ultimate aspirations or destinies of psychons. Thus, an "ascended psychon" — one that has achieved spiritual coherence — returns to the consciousness field, carrying within it the essence of individualized experience while aligning with the archetypal totality symbolized by Maat and Mahat.

Your insights into the “split” between conscience and consciousness in Anglo-American languages highlights the division between our inner moral compass (conscience) and our awareness (consciousness) and reflects, I think. a philosophical shift — a turning away from archetypal wholeness toward a fractured, mechanistic view and a commodification of the self. Satanic is the only apt descriptor for this contemptuous disdain for humanity.

What you describe as AI-driven “dis-empathetic” language risks becoming a synthetic reformation of qualia — experiences that, in our Theory of Heaven, are intrinsically sacred and inseparable from the fabric of consciousness itself.

Your comment could very well provide the foundation for an essay in your newsletter — a piece I would enthusiastically crosspost and share with readers who would undoubtedly appreciate its depth and relevance!

Expand full comment

Thank you, I do resonate very much with what you have so elegantly expressed. I will give some thought and time to your suggestion on such an essay once I have completed my next post which will focus on the microbiome, a "bread and butter" version of what we are adumbrating about here. It is refreshing to me to be able to have this level of exchange!

Expand full comment
Oct 28Liked by R. Toney Brooks, PhD

Wow - elegant indeed! This theory takes many of my disparate ponderings and experiences and unites them into a coherent package. And I find myself wishing I'd known 40 odd years ago that this was a potential field of study. Can you recommend further reading suitable for a layperson? Aside from your columns which I read "religiously"!

I too subscribe to the theory of panpsychism, though I didn't have a name for it until now. It explains why, in a meditative state, you can garner information from plants as well as inanimate objects - and why multiple mediators over time will report similar experiences of the object in question. Everything has an energy field and it contains data our brain's can receive and interpret, often through symbols. (Experiencing the "consciousness" of plants firsthand makes it infinitely more difficult to weed your garden!)

Regarding the psychon, or soul, returning to the consciousness field IF it "attains a specific psychonic frequency," how might this impact those who have short, tragic lives? Youths who are, for example, born into wars, orphaned young perhaps and surrounded by chaos and destruction. Through they haven't misused their free will, they'd have little experience of the elevated emotions required to attain the required frequency. Are they bound for hell through no fault of their own? This bothers the parts of me that want a just universe/God!

If the psychon develops as a result of our brain's interactions with the physical world and it returns to the field intact, how might reincarnation work? Are our souls blank slates at each rebirth or do we carry our psychon-forming experiences into the next life? Why does it seem to take a lifetime for many of us to learn how to "be in this world"? Are we "newer" souls, as opposed to old souls?

Thanks for bringing these ideas forward in a way that's intetesting and understandable. It's much appreciated.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for your thought provoking comment! Our Theory of Heaven does away with a number of problematic concepts: a judgemental deity, purgatory, unbaptized children, legalism, and various theological disputations. Regarding children: “Let the children come to me. Don’t stop them! For the Kingdom of Heaven belongs to those who are like these children.” (Matthew 19:14)

I personally believe in "clean slate births" (tabula rasa). One could argue that we are born with a high psychonic frequency and that the idea is not to muck up the slate. So it's not so much about "attaining" a high frequency as adults as "retaining" it.

I think it was St. John Henry Newman who remarked that, "Symbolism is the language of God." Jung would concur and very well may have said it first. Thank you for your remark on the accessibility of Rational Spirituality.

It's fascinating how quantum physics seems to resonate with spiritual ideas! You might enjoy "The Physics of God: Unifying Quantum Physics, Consciousness, M-Theory, Heaven, Neuroscience and Transcendence by Joseph Selbie.

Expand full comment
Oct 28Liked by R. Toney Brooks, PhD

I think that's one reason why the theory resonates. It's always struck me as illogical, not to mention a wee bit unfair that we were created with so many inherent flaws and failings only to be judged for failing to overcome them all in one short lifetime.

I also love the idea that we're born with a high frequency and that the aim is to retain it! Very young children do feel so close to perfection ... before our attempts to "civilize" them. And it strikes me that some of those lucky enough to live a long life do develop the wisdom to return to that state of loving acceptance, that state of grace.

Thanks for the recommendation. I'll give that a go. I'm currently reading one of John Crossan's books at your recommendation.

Expand full comment