Ordo ab Subverso
The Trickster Archetype
We begin our survey of order and chaos by referencing a seminal moment in American and Cold War history.
Addressing an audience at American University in 1961, President John F. Kennedy posed a pivotal question: "What kind of peace do we seek?" Previously in his inaugural address, he clearly summed up his foreign policy: "Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate." Camelot, as the Kennedy years were later called, reflected a time when certain traditional values were held sacrosanct in America.
However, the landscape has dramatically shifted since the Cold War's conclusion with the collapse of the Soviet Union. Indeed, times have changed markedly since 1961, and with them, those once-cherished traditional values have faded. The present administration, bereft of what many consider fundamental democratic values such as peace, justice and the Rule of Law, now pose a question in stark contrast to Kennedy’s: "What kind of war shall we start next?"
This sad state of affairs prompts a reflection on the nature of power and its corruptive potential, especially in light of historical events. President Kennedy, a staunch advocate for peace, was assassinated in 1963— a fact that some attribute to the actions of a deep-seated, near omnipotent paramilitary arm of what is termed the ‘Military Industrial Complex’ or 'Deep State,’ a cabal of globalist elites.
This now common view calls to mind Ephesians 6:12, which warned about "the rulers of the darkness of this world… and spiritual wickedness in high places," suggesting a conspiratorial network of power that operates beyond the public eye — a metaphysical belligerent in a macrocosmic spiritual war that pitts order against chaos.
To safeguard our Republic, currently imperiled from within, it is imperative to identify and understand this adversary and its ultimate goal. Drawing on Sun Tzu's wisdom in "The Art of War," he advises, "If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles." This ancient counsel underscores the necessity of comprehending not only the enemy's strategies and tactics but also our own strengths and weaknesses.
Echoing this sentiment, Winston Churchill once declared, "You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word. It is victory, victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival." Churchill's words resonate deeply today, emphasizing that the stakes are nothing less than the survival of the United States of America and Western Civilization itself, both purported targets of a Global Cabal appropriately described as a death cult.
We aim to underscore the gravity of the threats we face, which are existential in nature, and the necessity of a clear, Churchillian pursuit of victory to preserve our values and way of life. We also aim to characterize this threat in metaphysical terms, for I believe this is the only way in which it can be properly understood and assessed.
In addition to Sun Tzu's insights, the work of Prussian General Carl von Clausewitz, particularly his seminal book "On War," has profoundly influenced military strategy and other competitive fields such as business and sports. I frequently referenced Clausewitz throughout my broadcasting career regarding market strategies.
The first, the supreme, the most far-reaching act of judgment that the statesman and commander have to make is to establish... the kind of war on which they are embarking.
Clausewitz, On War
This insight from Clausewitz is crucial in understanding military engagements, such as the American experience in Vietnam. Initially, American generals believed they were countering an insurgency led by the Viet Cong. However, this was unmasked during 1968 Tet Offensive, which revealed we were, in fact, facing an invasion by North Vietnamese forces, as brilliantly detailed in Col. Harry Summers' 1995 book, “On Strategy.”
Today, the situation in Israel is as complex. Officially recognized as the Jewish homeland in 1947 by the UN, Israel faces an ongoing conflict with Hamas and Hezbollah, acknowledged Iranian proxies. On one level, these identical twin conflicts involve movements striving for self-determination— a universal aspiration.
On another level, Israel perceives the conflict as the initial stages of a far broader existential threat, referred to in biblical prophecy as "Gog and Magog," hostile armies gathering in the north.
These two examples underscore the recurring theme of strategic misjudgments and their consequential impacts. The War in Ukraine represents another unfortunate instance of these failings. The publicly declared goal of this conflict by the West was deemed unrealistic — saving a democracy that never existed — while the actual objective of regime change in Russia remains obscure, dangerous and dubious. Russia, you see, is a thorn in Globalism’s saddle.
Understanding the essence of these conflicts requires a complete examination of the underlying motives and goals of the involved entities. We must boldly inquire: what are the ultimate aims and true intentions behind the deceptive narratives and manipulative strategies?
This approach necessitates a cursory comprehension of the principles that educe order from disorder — a concept deeply embedded within philosophical and esoteric traditions. To effectively navigate and understand these dynamics, we should familiarize ourselves with both the archetypes and the metaphysical processes that facilitate extracting order from chaos, encapsulated by the phrase "ordo ab chao."
This inquiry not only will enrich our understanding of current geopolitical tensions but also connect them to broader, timeless philosophical and esoteric inquiries.
Ordo ab Chao et Ordo ab Discordia
“Ordo ab Chao," a Latin maxim particularly revered within the Scottish Rite's 33rd Degree of Freemasonry, translates to "Order out of Chaos." This principle suggests that significant structural and societal organization can emerge even from turmoil, reflecting a universal truth recognized across various philosophical schools.
The Hegelian dialectic, which posits that the conflict between opposing forces leads to a new, synthesized state, exemplifies this idea. In contrast, the monistic Principia Discordia1 sidesteps the issue altogether. I mention it because it evokes the archetype of the Trickster, as we shall see.
The chaos observed in the current socio-political landscape appears far from a natural occurrence; it resembles a deliberate tool of warfare aimed at fracturing societal cohesion. Chaos has been weaponized! This assertion is evinced by events portrayed as organic grassroots movements which were, in actuality, orchestrated disruptions.
Notable among them are the contested narratives surrounding the George Floyd incident— a drug overdose rather than a homicide — and the depiction of the January 6th mostly peaceful demonstration as an “insurrection.” The self-serving duplicity and hypocrisy constantly flowing from the present administration is mind-boggling.
And complicity of mainstream legacy media is undeniable; it serves as a vehicle for spreading confusion and misinformation. The resulting scenario underscores the importance of a vigilant and informed citizenry. Part of the solution lies in disengaging from manipulative media sources and fostering networks of individuals dedicated to uncovering and disseminating truth.
This approach would not only foster a better-informed public but also empower individuals to engage more critically with the information they encounter. By promoting a culture of skepticism, society can better resist manipulative narratives and engender a more resilient and cohesive community. Such a shift towards critical engagement and reliance on verifiable sources is essential in navigating and mitigating the adverse impact of orchestrated chaos.
Ordo ab Discordia
"Ordo ab Discordia" delves into the principle of "Order from Discord," as espoused by Discordianism, a parody religion that uses humor and irreverence to explore philosophical themes.2 This religion posits that chaotic and unpredictable interactions can catalyze the creation of new, structured realities. This notion implicates the archetype of the trickster — a figure that disrupts the status quo, thereby initiating novel ways of thinking and existing.
Carl Jung, the renowned analytical psychologist, characterizes the trickster as an embodiment of chaos, humor and subversion, referring to it as a type of 'super intelligence.' This archetype plays a critical role in challenging and transforming existing norms and structures.
Discordianism not only contributes to the cultural understanding of this archetype but has also spurred developments in metaphysical disciplines such as 'chaos magic.' Additionally, its influence extends into computer culture and various online communities, where the principles of unpredictability and subversion are often at play. At example is X, the former Twitter, which is at once is an online litter box and a crucial wellspring of truth. It’s a microcosmic, virtual Trickster.
Both Ordo ab Chao and Ordo ab Discordia propose the idea that societal change arises organically. While the former is steeped in historical and metaphysical context, the latter takes a more playful and irreverent approach. Discordians are suspicious of everything. Ordo ab Chao emphasizes order emerging from chaos, while Ordo ab Discordia explores humor and disruption as catalysts for significant societal and philosophical transformations.
Regardless, when chaos is intentionally and maliciously manufactured on a massive scale, it morphs into a highly destructive force, which I refer to as ‘Ordo ab Subverso’ — a distortion of the natural order akin to psychopathy. This term describes the pernicious manipulation of chaos, representing a calculated strategy to undermine the processes that would naturally lead to societal improvement and enlightenment.
This is the creature we fight — an insidious entity that is subversive, immoral and deceitful. Benjamin Franklin's prescient remark about the American Constitution may have anticipated such threats to societal stability. When asked, “What kind of government have you given us, Doctor?” Franklin's response was poignant: “A Republic, if you can keep it.”
This historical exchange underscores the ongoing challenge of preserving the integrity of a remarkable system threatened, implausibly, by internal forces intent on subverting it. Franklin's words resonate today as a reminder of the vigilance required to uphold the principles of the Republic amidst efforts to destabilize and corrupt it.3
Ordo ab Subverso
The term "Ordo ab Subverso," which we have coined, refers to this specifically engineered type of chaos — distinct from natural occurrences. It denotes a corruption of the natural process that typically facilitates positive change, twisting it towards more sinister and destructive outcomes.
Unlike the spontaneous chaos that can lead to organic growth and renewal, manufactured chaos is strategically employed to undermine established norms and values systematically.
This perverted process specifically targets the ‘progressive’ panoply promoting societal change. It co-opts genuine progressive ideologies — those intended to foster positive developments through concepts like equality, justice and social reform — and subverts them to serve detrimental macropolitical agendas.
Ordo ab Subverso thus represents an inversion of moral principles or virtue, where ethical boundaries are dismissed, and any means are justified if they contribute to the desired end. In this schema, no action is considered too extreme; nothing is deemed off limits, as we have witnessed.
The stability and integrity of democratic republics hinge not only on the consent of the governed but also on the active participation and informed awareness of the citizenry. This narrative on Order from Chaos underscores the critical role that an engaged and knowledgeable public plays in maintaining the health and efficacy of democratic systems, particularly in the face of efforts to manipulate and corrupt these systems from within, no less.
The Trickster Archetype
In the Manichean polarities and stark dichotomies of good versus evil and light versus darkness, the Trickster archetype is a crucial figure. But the polarity of order versus chaos is more appropriately invoked when describing the Trickster.
The Trickster archetype recurs in various forms across global mythology, folklore and literature, embodying roles such as shape-shifters, boundary-crossers and disruptors of the established order. In the narrative of this essay, Morgan le Fay, the Sorceress Queen of the Faeries from Arthurian legend (pictured above), personifies the Trickster archetype. She’s much like a ‘sparrow’ from the (unintentionally) predictive programming book and film Red Sparrow, and the character, Pirate Captain Jack Sparrow.
Morgan le Fay is renowned for her role in orchestrating complex events that sowed disruption within King Arthur’s court, epitomizing the Trickster's ability to manipulate and subvert. Her actions in the legends, particularly as depicted in Sandys’ painting, showcase her wielding chaos magic — a form of magic that leverages the unpredictable.
In Sandys’ artwork above, Morgan is portrayed standing before a loom, having weaved a magical robe destined to consume King Arthur by fire upon wearing it, thus demonstrating her mastery and prowess as a manipulator and disruptor. The symbolism is key. By destroying Arthur, she aims to destabilize the kingdom and weaken its leadership. Fire symbolizes transformation.
The Trickster archetype captures the inherent tension between chaos and order, embodying both simultaneously. This paradoxical nature is akin to the concept of quantum superpositions, where potential states exist concurrently until observed, thereby crystallizing a particular reality. Tricksters, through their actions, disrupt established structures (order) while simultaneously unveiling hidden possibilities (chaos).
Historically, significant shifts in understanding and practice often arise from periods of disruption and chaos. As the world transitions from the Age of Pisces to the Age of Aquarius, a shift in paradigms is necessitated, ipso facto. From time to time, we require a fresh lens through which to view our evolving reality.
This movement mirrors historical precedents where transformative ideas disrupted entrenched beliefs, such as Copernicus challenging the geocentric model, or Einstein revolutionizing our grasp of space and time through his theory of relativity.
Today, rapid technological advancements — like the Internet, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing — are similarly disrupting existing frameworks and setting the stage for even more profound changes. Tricksters are pivotal in these transitions; they are the agents who question authority, challenge prevailing dogmas and promote unconventional thinking.
By leveraging chaos, Tricksters dismantle rigid structures, making space for innovation and the emergence of new paradigms. In doing so, they not only influence the course of events but also help shape the future by revealing and actualizing latent possibilities.
Tricksters can also function as double agents, capable of indoctrinating their own brigade of ‘Manchurian Candidates.’ Keen observers may discern, albeit not easily, patterns in events since 2020 that align with this concept.
Our allegiance aligns with the Trickster and the principles of Ordo ab Discordia. We hold a firm belief that a new multipolar reality will materialize, irrespective of whether it receives the endorsement of the West or the architects of the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset, who harbor ambitions towards transhumanism and the suppression of the human spirit.
Furthermore, it is essential to recognize a significant yet often overlooked possible factor in the Great Reset scheme: alien involvement. The proposition is even compelling at times. As we anticipate future revelations related to 'Disclosure,’ it is crucial to approach such revelations with skepticism and not accept them at face value. More detailed discussions on this complex topic will follow in subsequent weeks.
Meanwhile, please bear this in mind. Archetypes are universal symbols and patterns that recur across different cultures and epochs. They manifest as subtle electromagnetic energy fields and are deeply embedded within the human psyche. When these archetypes are activated or constellated they profoundly influence our thoughts, behaviors and emotions, serving as engineers for both individual and collective transformations. This deep-seated influence underscores the power of archetypes to shape human experiences and the broader cultural landscape.
There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Hamlet, Shakespeare
Before encountering the spectral figure of his father, Hamlet likely adhered to Horatio’s more empirical, common-sense perception of reality. However, this confrontation with the supernatural opens up new layers of understanding for Hamlet, challenging his — and by extension, the audience's — perception of what is real.
Let us draw a parallel between the ghost, or phantasm, in Hamlet and the distorted perceptions of reality held dear by enthusiasts of the Great Reset. This comparison extends to the 1979 movie Phantasm, in which the ghost in Hamlet can be likened to the movie’s antagonist, the Tall Man.
The Tall Man, a sinister and supernatural undertaker who oversees a local cemetery, engages in macabre activities far removed from the mundane. He reanimates the dead, shrinking bodies to half their size to create dwarf zombies to serve his nefarious purposes.
In both of these narratives, we are confronted with entities that dramatically skew the protagonists' and viewers’ understanding of reality. These figures disrupt the normal order of things, prompting a deeper examination of the unseen forces at play in our lives and, by extension, in societal structures influenced by shadowy agendas and manipulative powers, such as the World Economic Forum.
Rest easy, dear readers. Ze zombies will own nothing and za will be happy!
Principia Discordia (wiki)